The objections never end. Good thing the solutions don’t either.
The objections never end. Good thing the solutions don’t either.
Turri, J. (2013). Infinitism, finitude and normativity. Philosophical Studies, 163(3), 791–795.
I evaluate two new objections to an infinitist account of epistemic justification, and conclude that they fail to raise any new problems for infinitism. The new objections are a refined version of the finite-mind objection, which says infinitism demands more than finite minds can muster, and the normativity objection, which says infinitism entails that we are epistemically blameless in holding all our beliefs. I show how resources deployed in response to the most popular objection to infinitism, the original finite-mind objection, can be redeployed to address the two new objections.