Objective Falsity Is Essential to Lying: An Argument from Convergent Evidence

Turri, J. (2021). Objective falsity is essential to lying: an argument from convergent evidence. Philosophical studies, 178(6), 2101-2109.

This paper synthesizes convergent lines of evidence to evaluate the hypothesis that  objective falsity is essential to lying. Objective accounts of lying affirm this hypothesis; subjective accounts deny it. Evidence from history, logic, social observation, popular culture, lexicography, developmental psychology, inference, spontaneous description, and behavioral experimentation strongly supports the hypothesis. Studies show that the only apparent evidence against the hypothesis is due to task substitution, i.e. ethical concerns or perspective-taking interfering with performance on categorization tasks. I conclude that, overall, existing evidence decisively favors objective accounts.